2.9 hRank
Uptime, 30 days
IPs Downtime, 30 days
~ 04h 05m
Response Time, 30 days
1011 ms
Shared IPs, today
6 0
Hosted Websites, today
440 -22
WebHost.pro Uptime, %
Last 30 days
3 months
All time
Response, ms
Last 30 days
3 months
All time
Shared IPs Sites
Last 30 days
3 months
All time
This provider is out of our top list. We can recommend you the best options.
Worst Shared IPs by Uptime
The domains from these shared IPs (5 random domains are checking every 5 min from 1 IP) showed the worst uptime results for the period of the last 30 days.
Shared IP
uptime, % 99.780 99.815 99.896 99.954 99.988
response, ms 668 599 1281 1091 2332
hosted sites 121 61 57 63 67
downtime ~ 01h 35m ~ 01h 19m ~ 44m ~ 19m ~ 05m
Bad Shared IPs Count By Date
Here is the list of shared IPs where domains experienced downtime for the previous 7 days. The statistics is presented for each day, with the number of shared IPs and their domains' downtime data.
Date Total Shared IPs Bad Shared IPs Total Downtime
2019-02-15 6 0 0
2019-02-14 6 0 0
2019-02-13 6 1 ~ 15m
2019-02-12 6 0 0
2019-02-11 6 1 ~ 05m
2019-02-10 6 0 0
2019-02-09 6 0 0
WebHost.pro Review Visit provider
WebHost.pro Thumbnail

Webhost.pro was founded in 2001 as a company that would offer “a stable web hosting service with personal support and transparency”. Now it has been in the industry for years and have grown into a reputable business known in the USA.

In our experience with this hosting (since 2105), we haven’t registered any particular faults on their part.


Among the reasons why you should choose them 100% uptime is mentioned. Their general performance has mostly been stable for the monitoring period; though, not exactly smooth if you take a longer period. However, in accordance with our uptime chart, they did their best trying to keep their promise recently.

Response Time

“We limit the amount of accounts on each server to about three hundred websites at a time. Our competitors (like the ones you see on TV) host thousands of websites per server.” That’s the statement with the meaning they are better, and it is a fair one but to a certain extent.

The thing here is not just in the number of accounts per server but rather more about the effort of a company to keep their servers not really crowded in regards to their capacity and also well-protected. Thus, they are more likely to respond faster (and stay uptime).


Webhost.pro can be referred to the range of providers that offer budget hosting. There are several plans on offer, also several payment options. There is a 45-days money back guarantee, you can try and test it for yourself.


Support options offered: phone and fax numbers, contact form. Ticket system is also here. However, we’ve had no opportunity to test this one as we were lucky not to have any problems with our project during the entire subscription with Webhost.pro. Thus, let’s say, they are ok.

Other Features

Webhost.pro started in 2001 ( a long way back, yeah). They do have years of experience in the industry and are attentive to their reputation. Shared hosting is not the only thing they offer, and they seem to get pretty favourable feedback from their customers on the Internet in general (which might be not the most representative factor; however, there are hostings that receive mostly negative reviews). There is no chance at the moment to trace the way their website looked since its creation, but the present design is very nice and user-friendly. They are cool here, too.

Webhost.pro can be characterised as a fairly good choice for a budget dependable hosting. We give them 2.9 HRANK for pretty stable uptime and not the speediest but also quite consistent response time, all combined with their policy for prices and overall customer-oriented approach.

Last updated December 7, 2018
Share Your Experience
Post Comment