|Month||HRANK||# in TOP||Uptime, %||Response, ms||Sites, +(-)||Shared IPs, +(-)|
|Year||HRANK||# in TOP||Uptime, %||Response, ms||Sites, +(-)||Shared IPs, +(-)|
Business Name: Nexcess.net
Year of foundation: 2000
Location: Southfield, Michigan, USA
BBB Accreditation: Yes
Market Size: > 1.9K websites (#105 in HRank list)
Growth Status: (by websites quantity): Decreasing
Some facts: Nexcess has 5 datacenters located in the US, the UK, and Australia.
The company claims to offer superior services to its customers.
Offers and Pricing
|Name||Domains||Disk||Bandwidth||Min Price||Billing Term|
The provider doesn’t have any current shared plans on offer.
Nexcess is a hosting provider specializing in Magento and WordPress hosting solutions.
However, their services are not limited to hosting adjusted to these CMSs: they also offer SSL certificates, dedicated servers, CDN servers, domain registration, cluster environments, OroCRM hosting, Michigan colocation, etc.
As seen from the list above, Nexcess provides services which are tailored to certain requirements and adjusted in accordance with what the purpose of your website is.
While the provider’s specialization and professional approach to custom solutions make it look reliable, it remains unclear whether they really manage to practice what they claim, as the reviews of their services are mixed, with references to slow customer support and billing issues.
Still, the negative reviews they have are not numerous, and since angry users are more likely to rate companies than satisfied customers, it appears that Nexcess is worth a try and could turn out to be a good option.
Instant Technical Live Support: No
Their customer support team is available round the clock via live chat, emails, and phone. Live chat is only for sales inquiries.
The feature that makes the hosting provider special is its ability to offer specially built solutions, which, according to their website, enables them to outperform other industry players by 13X.
Nexcess Summary Analysis by HRank
The provider came the 129th in our chart and it scored 4.4 HRank in 2018.
5.1 HRank with 141st position in 2019.
Its uptime history chart reveals that the provider lacked stability in 2018/2019 and had periods of downtime as low as 97% and 98%.
Its response time results were not bad (better than others showed) but not excellent either – 400ms-450ms on average.
The Sites chart reveals a clear decreasing tendency in the number of websites in 2018/19.