/ 10
3.2
HRank
Uptime, 30 days
98.854%
Response Time, 30 days
438 ms
Shared IPs, today
2 0
Hosted Websites, today
221 -2
BigBytes Uptime, %
ranking data
not ranking data
BigBytes Response, ms
BigBytes IPs / Sites in Rating
Shared IPs
Sites
Total BigBytes IPs / Sites
Shared IPs
Sites
Worst Shared IPs by Uptime
visit provider
BigBytes.net domains from these shared IPs (5 random domains are being checked every 5 min from 1 IP) showed the worst uptime results for the period of the last 30 days.
Shared IP Uptime, % Response, ms Hosted Sites Downtime
209.51.129.210 97.750 483 108 ~ 13h 30m
205.251.152.162 99.903 395 113 ~ 35m
Bad Shared IPs Count by Date
visit provider
Here is the list of BigBytes.net shared IPs where domains experienced downtime for the previous 7 days. The statistics is presented for each day, with the number of shared IPs and their domains' downtime data.
Date Total Shared IPs Bad Shared IPs Total IPs Downtime Affected Sites
2020-08-06 2 1 ~ 20m 108
2020-08-05 2 - - -
2020-08-04 2 - - -
2020-08-03 2 - - -
2020-08-02 2 - - -
2020-08-01 2 - - -
2020-07-31 2 1 ~ 15m 113
Last 6 Months Performance Values
visit provider
Month HRANK # in TOP Uptime, % Response, ms Sites, +(-) Shared IPs, +(-)
Jul 2020 3.2 162 98.210 447 0 0
Jun 2020 3.2 154 98.788 442 -3 0
May 2020 3.2 158 98.472 450 -5 0
Apr 2020 3.2 167 99.175 431 -5 0
Mar 2020 3.2 171 98.330 425 -8 0
Feb 2020 3.2 178 99.083 421 -2 0
Performance by Years
visit provider
Year HRANK # in TOP Uptime, % Response, ms Sites, +(-) Shared IPs, +(-)
2018 3.2 214 99.452 371 -33 0
2019 3.2 204 99.180 345 -7 0
2020 3.2 161 98.747 439 -25 0

BigBytes.net Review

visit provider
BigBytes.net Thumbnail

Background

Business Name: BigBytes.Net

Year of foundation: 1999

Location: San Pedro, Philippines

BBB Accreditation: No

Market Size: > 200 websites (#183 HRank list)

Growth Status: (by websites quantity): Decreasing

BigBytes.net is a hosting provider offering affordable solutions for both businesses and individuals. The company is Philippines-based and known for providing hosting services that are not just affordable – they are cheap.

As to the equipment used, BigBytes claims to utilize Intel7 and Harpertown/Clovertown servers in RAID configuration.

However, looking at their website, you cannot help feeling that the design of it is stuck somewhere in the 90s, and perhaps they may benefit from introducing information about themselves some other way, using advanced web technologies and more convenient, user-friendly design.


Offers and Pricing

Shared Hosting Plans
Name Domains Disk Bandwidth Min Price Billing Term
Startup Unlim 0.025 Gb 0.5 Gb $0.68 6 Mo
Economy Unlim 0.2 Gb 4 Gb $1.36 6 Mo
Professional Unlim 0.5 Gb 10 Gb $1.97 6 Mo
Small Business Unlim 1 Gb 20 Gb $4.55 6 Mo
Corporate Unlim 5 Gb 100 Gb $6.06 6 Mo
Enterprise Unlim 10 Gb 200 Gb $12.29 6 Mo

The company offers shared web hosting. Currently, there are 6 shared plans on offer and one can basically choose any (monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, annual, biannual and triennial) subscription.

Monthly prices for the cheapest payment plan are presented in the table above. Starting from 6 months, monthly prices for plans are the same. Only shorter periods are more expensive.

No monthly options for Startup, Economy, and Professional. Startup also lacks a quarterly payment option.

Reseller and dedicated plans are also available.

Hosting solutions, domain registration services, SSL certificates, and website development at low prices are what make BigBytes special: their packages imply 30-day money back guarantees, and the set of features included is basic, but since the rates are so low, the plans offered can be considered economy-class.


Support

Instant Technical Live Support: No

It looks like all the support is available to the existing customers only. Their contact page contains no contacts at all (and no company info either), it also lacks any emails or phone numbers or else.

“Please use the new client area to contact us for sales inquiry and/or submit support tickets,” this is all we can refer to. Well… they definitely could benefit from adding some information to their pages because at the moment their website looks dated and unreliable.


Report for 2018

  • In 2018 its performance wasn’t great either: 3.2 HRank and #214.
  • Uptime chart reveals many downtime cases as bad as ~84%, ~88%, and ~97%. In some periods it was very unstable.
  • Its response time was way better (300-400ms), however, the chart reveals a lot of instability as well.
  • Thus, perhaps this explains why a certain number of websites left the provider in 2018.
Last updated July 31, 2019
Share Your Experience