|Shared IP||Uptime, %||Response, ms||Hosted Sites||Downtime|
|Date||Total Shared IPs||Bad Shared IPs||Total IPs Downtime||Affected Sites|
|Month||HRANK||# in TOP||Uptime, %||Response, ms||Sites, +(-)||Shared IPs, +(-)|
|Year||HRANK||# in TOP||Uptime, %||Response, ms||Sites, +(-)||Shared IPs, +(-)|
Business Name: XeHost.net
Year of foundation: 1999
Location: Plainview, NY, USA
BBB Accreditation: No
Market Size: > 2K websites (#103 in HRank list)
Growth Status: (by websites quantity): Increasing
Offers and Pricing
|Name||Domains||Disk||Bandwidth||Min Price||Billing Term|
|Bronze Budget||2||0.5 Gb||10 Gb||$2.99||1 Mo|
|Silver Budget||3||1 Gb||20 Gb||$4.99||1 Mo|
|Gold Budget||6||1.5 Gb||30 Gb||$9.99||1 Mo|
|Bronze Premium||20||8 Gb||50 Gb||$12.99||1 Mo|
|Silver Premium||Unlim||12 Gb||60 Gb||$14.99||1 Mo|
|Gold Premium||Unlim||16 Gb||70 Gb||$19.99||1 Mo|
Currently, the XeHost.net is not available, no price information updates are possible. The information in the table above hasn’t been updated for some time. (As of March 11, 2019)
XeHost.net at the present moment it offers a range of web hosting services from shared to reseller to VPS.
They have two levels of shared web hosting – budget and premium.
The former starts from $2.99, the latter from $12.99. Users can choose the option that suits them both in terms of features offered.
Instant Technical Live Support: No
The company has an address and a toll-free phone number but this seems to be all of the support options offered by the company.
They also mention support tickets on their main page as well.
Well, maybe they are prompt to answer in their social networks when it comes to general inquiries.
The company’s website has a very laconic design, which might be good for one thing, but for another, they don’t seem to be offering active services at the moment as none of the purchase buttons seem to work.
XeHost Summary Analysis by HRank
XeHost is located on the 220th
In 2019: 3.7 HRank with 194th position.
Downtime cases of ~90% (even 70%) were among the reasons why the provider got such a low overall rating.
Also, the provider was noted by lower than average response time (lower than many slow providers in the list): 1,500ms – 2,000ms. The response chart also reveals a very unstable performance.
The number of domains decreased.